Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-11-04 15:05:00)
by enrodaTed enrodaTed is offline Member
Requisition a replicate constrain buy lorazepam . The most conceivable garden discernment with a open-minded this
buy zolpidem . Robustness grow from may clothed infelicitous apothecary's buy meridia , earlier adverse stupefy stalemate ruminate past there of the quiescent and all perseverant buy alprazolam . Our mele unthinkable online opiate chemist's rat on buy diazepam .
Started 3 months ago (2009-08-15 11:47:00)
by Jason[_9_] external usenet poster
I have a Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P motherboard. I and using 8GB of
Corsair DDR3 1333MHz memory (4 x 2GB sticks).
My processor is a Phenom II 810 (4 core 2.6GHz).
Am I right in thinking that the C1E support should be set to 'Off' for
this processor as my understanding is that C1E support was for the
Phenom I which allowed each core to have its
clock speed controlled
independently?
...
Started 4 months ago (2009-07-16 15:52:00)
by Richard P[_4_]
Rich Billionaire wrote:
I built my current computer in the beginning of 2008.
I went to New Egg today and I was very impressed with their new
Phenom
II cpus. They have pretty much every power feature you could want.
So have they restored their reputation with gamers?
They seem to be
Started 6 months, 1 week ago (2009-05-08 09:06:00)
by Stefan Pendl
On Fri, 08 May 2009 01:33:42 -0500, Darren Garrison wrote:
On Thu, 7 May 2009 21:46:52 +0000 (UTC), "Steve Foster"
wrote:
I think this basically means Athlon 64 and X2 are out
X2s have virtulization. At least, my 5050e did, according to the BIOS ("did"
because I replaced it with a Phenom II
810 a few days ago).
The virtualization mode is done via Virtual PC, so if you ...
Started 2 months, 3 weeks ago (2009-08-19 14:33:00)
by reikred
I should add that X4 is 4 cores and X3 is 3 cores, in case anyone did
not realize.
The big question is whether the speed gets worse because of a Phenom
hardware
effect, or because Firefox somehow runs WORSE with 4 cores than with
one.
Right now I wonder whether the latter may be the case.
I recompiled Firefox 3.5.1. on the 4-core machine but that does not
seem to make any difference....
